facebook rss twitter

More harsh words on Sony's PS3

by Steven Williamson on 18 January 2007, 11:51

Tags: PlayStation 3, Sony Computers Entertainment Europe (NYSE:SNE), PS3

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qahqp

Add to My Vault: x



In an article from Game Informer magazine, Valve's Gabe Newell has spoken frankly about Sony and the Playsation 3. Of course, Newell worked for Microsoft for 13 years so there may be an alternative motive behind his comments.

"The PS3 is a total disaster on so many levels, I think It’s really clear that Sony lost track of what customers and what developers wanted,"said Newell. "I’d say, even at this late date, they should just cancel it and do a ‘do over’. Just say, ‘This was a horrible disaster and we’re sorry and we’re going to stop selling this and stop trying to convince people to develop for it.’"

US Analysts, American Technology Research recently claimed that Sony aren't selling as many consoles as they claim, "Our channel checks yesterday of 52 retail stores, from boutiques to big-box retailers, showed that 28 of the 52 stores had PS3 consoles in stock, while none had Wii consoles in stock."

Sony has dismissed the claim that the PS3 is failing to sell in the US claiming that the high stock figures are due to the 'successful supply chain'. "It isn't because demand has weakened, it is because we have kept the supply pipeline moving, "said Sony's Dave Karraker.

The war of words on Sony's PS3 has been relentless ever since the console made its first outing at E3 on May 16th, 2005. Unfortunately for Sony, there are no signs of it slowing down with Bill Gates also making a statement to GamesIndustry.biz today where he said, "We wanted to be the guy with the small box that costs less. We wanted to have the most games. We wanted to play to our software strength, and tools and online.

"We wanted to swap positions with Sony. We wanted to not be a year late, not be a big box, not be a more expensive box. How are we doing on that?"


Referring specifically to the PS3, Gates took the opportunity to take a dig at the PS3 processors, saying "They were going to have the Cell be the video processor. But they didn't know what they were doing... They turned to Nvidia at the last minute, but Nvidia can't do embedded DRAM.

"Go look at the bandwidth problems... They took their year and burned it by not having a decent CPU strategy and then turning to Nvidia at the last minute. It's a very unusual thing. Those processors are isolated from each other."


More bitching to follow...


HEXUS Forums :: 9 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Sony
Sony has dismissed the claim that the PS3 is failing to sell in the US claiming that the high stock figures are due to the ‘successful supply chain’. “It isn't because demand has weakened, it is because we have kept the supply pipeline moving, ”said Sony's Dave Karraker.

Yeah right…
It's almost like Sony is saying they wanted their console to be a year late, use more power, use a Blu-ray player as standard, giving the developers the opportunity to develop large complicated games.

We as customers only care about gameplay and graphics. So even if Sony says the PS3 is way more powerfull, then why aren't the games any fancier? Sure, it's more difficult to develop, but the large performance difference (according to Sony) has to give developers an advantage. Even in these early days.
Furthermore, Microsoft at least gives you the option wether or not to buy the HD-DVD player. Some people don't want to spend extra just for the Blu-ray player. Then again, Sony says it's necessary in order to provide enough disc space for all HD game content. But again: why is it that Microsoft and the Xbox360 developers use a DVD with about 20% of BD's capacity, while still being able to match PS3's graphics and content?

Last but not least, I heard the PlayStation 3's power usage tops at 380 Watts. I haven't seen any real-life tests or confirmation of this value, but where smoke is, is fire.

I don't own a console at the moment and I'm not planning on getting one. If I would, it would be either the Xbox 360 for it's stunning graphics and large amount of games available. Or the Wii for it's gameplay, great design and innovativness. Without kidding, I can't name one advantage of the PlayStation 3 over the other consoles. Even if I take away the price, the only nice feature seems the Blu-ray player. But why would you want it with the HD-war not being to an end yet. As long as both formats exist, it's very tricky to choose either of them, especially at these prices.
“Microsfot”

First line :)
The console may be difficult to develop for, I can still see PS3 being a success as it's still got the support of a lot of Japanese developers, and the franchises that made PS popular in the first place (the Final Fantasys, Tekkens, Metal Gear Solids, Gran Turismos, Dragon Quests, etc).

Xbox just doesn't seem like it'll catch on in Japan.
Xbox 360 is technically the leader at the moment in both Europe and North America. They got the right taste of games for European and Norht American gamers.

But they still haven't find a way to attract more Japanese gamers. Japanese gamers like simple cuty mini games. Violent games are not selling well. If Microsoft can work on games using some of the Popular Japanese comic, make more simple games like what nintendo is doing.

And i think if they can specialize a japanese only xbox 360 with smaller design and fancier look, which only takes 64mb or bigger memory card. They may attract more japanese attention. Japanese people love small gadgets. That's a reason why ds lite and ipods are so popular.