HEXUS.gaming editor Nick
Haywood might be on a family holiday in the west country but,
seemingly, he's never on holiday. We received a call from him yesterday
spitting blood about the latest copy of Imagine Publishing's Play magazine - issue 138 - and the
fact that it claims that its staff
have played on a Sony PlayStation 3 - something that's Nick
reckons is impossible when the machine isn't
finished and won't go on sale until November!
It turns out, of course,
that Nick's right. No one on the mag
had actually played the PS3. All they've done is
have hands on with some dev kit - the same kit that Nick's
been on, he believes. And that's actually an Apple Mac emulating what
Sony says a PS3 will be like!
Unfortunately, no newstand buyer of the magazine will ever
realise the truth until they've coughed up £3.99,
broken open the sealed plastic bag in which the mag is sold and turned
to the brazen admission hidden within that, indeed, all they've done is
sit down with some dev kit.
With Nick being on holiday, we thought we better not
ask him to write up his discovery, so a trip to the shops was
undertaken to grab a mag for a close read and a bit of image scanning.
Trouble is, we ended up buying the wrong mag, picking up, instead,
Future Publishing's
PSW
magazine!
Dyslexia? Well, not totally. We were fooled by the fact that
the sealed bag in which issue 80 comes also claims
that the mag has played on a PS3!
Just in case you can't properly
see the
come-on lines at the top, click for a close up
And, of course, just like
Play, it's not possible to find out until after
you've bought the mag - again at £3.99 a pop - that they're
telling porkies!
But, you may ask, is
PSW
really
telling porkies? Indeed it is, and here's the page where this is
admitted - click on it to see the relevant paragraph:
Click to see relevant paragraph
Doubtless, the so called journalists who write and
approve the misleading come-on lines on the wrappers of
magazines such as
Play
and
PSW
believe it's okay to do what they do and, therefore, sleep
well at night.
But, to us, what they're doing is obtaining money - YOUR money - on
false pretences. That's something that we thought was supposed
to be a crime in this country.
Here at HEXUS.gaming, though, you can be sure that we'll always try to
maintain the highest possible ethical standards. So, for instance, you
can be certain that we won't be telling you we've
play a PS3 until we have actually sat down in front of a real PS3.
Also, when - as recently with
Test
Drive Unlimited for Xbox 360 - we're looking at pre-release
software, we'll try to ensure from the outset that you know that's
precisely what we're doing and not try to make wild claims that don't
stack up.
And, of course, if you don't like what we write, you can always shout
loud about it in the HEXUS.gaming forums and demand - and get
back - every penny you've spent on buying that article. Cough!
Want to have your say about this article? Well, join us over in the
HEXUS.gaming
forums right now and tell us your thoughts on the
ethics of newstand magazine come-on lines and whether you think we're
being unkind to the poor souls who write them.
As a snide aside, if you've read that paragraph about
Unreal Tournament 2007,
you might like to know one
other thing - the fact that characters are "1500 times more detailed"
than in
Unreal
Tournament 2004 has little if anything to do with the
PS3 as you're being led to believe - it's down to the engine
within the game. But, hey, why expect anything better than that for
your four quid?
Update April 15
- we did manage to get hold of a copy of Play, issue 138, and here's
what it's bag looks like:
And here's a close up of the most contentious stuff:
HEXUS.community :: your right2reply
In all fairness mentioning that you've had "hands on" is a pretty cheap shot. Although the fact that you have to pay £3 or so to read that they DIDN'T play on an actual PS3 is a bit expensive I think!Quote
What PLAY has proved is that, there is no point in buying gaming print magazines, you'll get the same information one month earlier online, than they have it! then scammed their readers into thinking they'd got the first look (okay it was worded cleverly, they did say they were the first mag to have first hands-on look).
I was a subscriber to OXM and I soon realised that 95% of the magazine was old news. Gaming print mags are over.Quote
A: Its usually old new compared to the web
B: It costs money
C: Some of the stuff they put in them is twaddle anywayQuote
Here's the front of the bag on Play issue 138*
Image: http://img.hexus.net/v2/gaming/mags/playmax138_cover_pull_tn.jpg
*And a close up of the relevant stuff*
Quote
As for Play, it seems a bit tabloid-ish.Quote
Reply